ReviewRadiology. Imaging cancer2025
Beyond Conventional CT: Role of Dual-Energy CT in Monitoring Response to Therapy in Abdominal Malignancies.
Review in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- What you don't see matters: dual-energy CT in emergency radiology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Seeing the invisible: practical strategies to maximize the clinical impact of photon-counting CT in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Role of spectral CT in quantitative evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- CT-based renal artery caliber change as a potential imaging marker of treatment response in renal cell carcinoma; an exploratory imaging study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, imaging plays a critical role in evaluating treatment response to various oncologic therapies. For decades, conventional morphologic assessments using cross-sectional imaging have been the standard for monitoring the effectiveness of systemic and locoregional therapies in patients with cancer. However, the development of new functional imaging tools has widened the scope of imaging from mere response assessment to patient selection and outcome prediction. Dual-energy CT (DECT), known for its superior material differentiation capabilities, shows promise in enhancing treatment response evaluation. DECT-based iodine quantification methods are increasingly being investigated as surrogates for assessing tumor vascularity and physiology, which is particularly important in patients undergoing emerging targeted therapies. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the current and emerging role of DECT in assessing treatment response in patients with malignant abdominal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.