ArticleJournal of health psychology2025
How can the illness risk representation framework be used to explain flu, whooping cough and Covid-19 vaccination uptake amongst pregnant women? A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore how the illness risk representation framework explains vaccination uptake in pregnant women. Pregnant women were recruited via hospitals and community groups. Semi-structured interviews with pregnant women, explored factors influencing vaccination uptake. Findings were analyzed using codebook approach to thematic analysis, and applied to illness risk representation framework (IRR). 43 interviews explored domains of the IRR showing good fit to vaccination beliefs of pregnant women. Identity beliefs focused on feelings of susceptibility to illness, beliefs about Cause related to exposure and prevalence to illness and feelings about immunity, Timeline beliefs included feelings about appropriate times to vaccinate, with some waiting to accept vaccinations. Beliefs about Consequences focused on perceived severity of illness and vaccine novelty, and Control beliefs included effectiveness of vaccinations, adverse effects and attempts to control exposure. Some domains of the IRR fit better than others, with estimates of likelihood and severity contributing to risk appraisals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.