ArticleJournal of medical virology2025
Enrichment of G-to-U Substitution in SARS-CoV-2 Functional Regions and Its Compensation via Concurrent Mutations.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We surveyed single nucleotide variant (SNV) patterns from 5 903 647 complete SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Among 10 012 SNVs, APOBEC-mediated C-to-U (C > U) deamination was the most prevalent, followed by G > U and other RNA editing-related substitutions including (A > G, U > C, G > A). However, C > U mutations were less frequent in functional regions, for example, S protein, intrinsic disordered regions, and nonsynonymous mutations, where G > U were over-represented. Notably, G-loss substitutions rarely appeared together. Instead, G-gain mutations tended to more frequently co-occur with others, with a marked preference in the S protein, suggesting a compensatory mechanism for G loss in G > U mutations. The temporal patterns revealed C > U frequency declined until late 2021 then resurged in early 2022. Conversely, G > U steadily decreased, with a pronounced drop in January 2022, coinciding with reduced COVID-19 severity. Vaccinated individuals exhibited a slightly but significantly higher C > U frequency and a notably lower G > U frequency compared to the unvaccinated group. Additionally, cancer patients had higher G > U frequency than general patients during the same period. Interestingly, none of the C > U SNVs were uniquely identified in 2724 environmental samples. These findings suggest novel functional roles of G > U in COVID-19 symptoms, potentially linked to oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species, while C > U remains the dominant substitution, likely driven by host immune-mediated RNA editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.