ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025
Identification of non-glandular trichome hairs in cannabis using vision-based deep learning methods.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of non-glandular trichome hairs in cannabis using vision-based deep learning methods.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of cannabis and cannabis-related products is a critical task for forensic laboratories and law enforcement agencies, given their harmful effects. Forensic laboratories analyze large quantities of plant material annually to identify genuine cannabis and its illicit substitutes. Ensuring accurate identification is essential for supporting judicial proceedings and combating drug-related crimes. The naked eye alone cannot distinguish between genuine cannabis and non-cannabis plant material that has been sprayed with synthetic cannabinoids, especially after distribution into the market. Reliable forensic identification typically requires two colorimetric tests (Duquenois-Levine and Fast Blue BB), as well as a drug laboratory expert test for affirmation or negation of cannabis hair (non-glandular trichomes), making the process time-consuming and resource-intensive. Here, we propose a novel deep learning-based computer vision method for identifying non-glandular trichome hairs in cannabis. A dataset of several thousand annotated microscope images was collected, including genuine cannabis and non-cannabis plant material apparently sprayed with synthetic cannabinoids. Ground-truth labels were established using three forensic tests, two chemical assays, and expert microscopic analysis, ensuring reliable classification. The proposed method demonstrated an accuracy exceeding 97% in distinguishing cannabis from non-cannabis plant material. These results suggest that deep learning can reliably identify non-glandular trichome hairs in cannabis based on microscopic trichome features, potentially reducing reliance on costly and time-consuming expert microscopic analysis. This framework provides forensic departments and law enforcement agencies with an efficient and accurate tool for identifying non-glandular trichome hairs in cannabis, supporting efforts to combat illicit drug trafficking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.