Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249003›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Estimation of genetic parameters and genetic trends for ewe longevity indicators in U.S. Katahdin sheep.

Luis F B Pinto, Ronald M Lewis, Artur O Rocha, Brad A Freking, Carrie S Wilson, Tom W Murphy, Sara M Nilson, Joan M Burke, Luiz F Brito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis F B PintoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0831-3293
Ronald M LewisDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Artur O RochaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-2925
Brad A FrekingUSDA-ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5385-5692
Carrie S WilsonUSDA-ARS, Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, Dubois, ID 83423, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9971-1061
Tom W MurphyUSDA-ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3527-8814
Sara M NilsonDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Joan M BurkeUSDA-ARS, Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, Booneville, AR 72927, USA.
Luiz F BritoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5819-0922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct genetic selection for increased ewe longevity can improve flock profitability and animal welfare. However, longevity indicator traits are not presently evaluated by the National Sheep Improvement Program (NSIP). The primary objective of this study was, therefore, to estimate genetic parameters for 8 longevity indicator traits using data collected in NSIP Katahdin flocks. Ewes (n = 12,734) were born between 1989 and 2020 in 58 flocks across the U.S. and were daughters of 1,245 sires and 6,325 dams. Traits evaluated were age at the last lambing (ALL), length of productive life (PL; number of days between the first and last lambing), total number of litters (TNL), total number of lambs born (TNB) and weaned (TNW) over ewe lifetime, total lamb birth weight (TLB) and total lamb weight at weaning (TLW) over ewe lifetime, and TLW divided by the ewe's 120 d adjusted body weight (TLWadj). Variance components were estimated using the AIREML method based on fitting an animal model using either a pedigree (A) or blended pedigree and genomic (H) relationship matrix. Genomic information of 10,032 animals genotyped with a 50K SNP chip was included in the analyses based on H matrix. Age at first lambing and birth-rearing type of the ewe were fitted as fixed effects, while the contemporary group (CG: flock-year-season of ewe's birth) was fitted as either a fixed (contemporary group fitted as a fixed effect) or random (contemporary group fitted as a random effect) effect. Breeding values and their accuracies were obtained for 127,535 animals in the pedigree using either best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) or single-step genomic BLUP. Genetic trends were evaluated based on all combinations of CG type and method for predicting breeding values. The averages of ALL, PL, TNL, TNB, TNW, TLB, TLW, and TLWadj were 1100 d, 890 d, 2.7 litters, 4.6 lambs, 4.3 lambs, 18 kg, 70 kg, and 2.8 kg/kg of ewe weight, respectively. The H matrix performed better than the A matrix, based on akaike information criterion and estimates of breeding value accuracy. Higher average accuracy values were observed when fitting CG as a random effect. The heritability estimates ranged from 0.06 ± 0.02 (TLWadj) to 0.15 ± 0.02 (TLB). All genetic and phenotypic correlations between longevity traits were greater than 0.80. Genetic trends were significant and positive for all traits, but no substantial genetic gains were observed. Considering the observed average values and the estimated genetic parameters, we recommend that longevity becomes part of the selection objectives for U.S. Katahdin sheep.

Indexed as

LongevityAnimalsBreedingFemaleGenotypeMalePedigreeSheepUnited Statesewe longevitygenetic predictionovineparameter estimationproductive life

Identifiers

PMID40249003
PMCPMC12124258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.