ArticleUrology research & practice2025
Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Palmex® (Roystonea regia Lipid Extract), Saw Palmetto, Finasteride and Tamsulosin in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment with Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, or tamsulosin administered for 6 months to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: This multicenter, open, prospective, comparative study was conducted in men !40 years with mild and moderate BPH according to the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (!1, <19). The study included 200 patients (50 per group) who were randomly allocated to receive Palmex® (320 mg/d), saw palmetto (320 mg/d), finasteride (5 mg/d), or tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d). The primary study outcome was the improvement of the maximum urinary flow (Qmax), while significant decreases in IPSS values, prostate size, and residual post-voiding volume were secondary efficacy variables. Statistical analysis was performed according to Intention to treat. Results: The demographic baseline characteristics of all the groups were similar. All groups exhibited a significant mean increase in Qmax from baseline to week 24, being 3.8 mL/s (27.7%), 3.6 mL/s (23.1%), 4.2 mL/s (28.6%), and 4.1 mL/s (26.3%) on Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin, respectively. Likewise, all the treatments significantly reduced the IPSS scores by 74.2% (Palmex®), 74.6% (saw palmetto), 60.3% (finasteride), and 74.2% (tamsulosin), also decreasing the prostate size and the residual post-voiding volume. No significant differences among the groups were found regarding any efficacy variable. The treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: Palmex® for 6 months demonstrated to have a comparable efficacy to saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin in patients with mild and moderate BPH, being safe and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.