Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248986›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Oncology Dose Optimization: Tailored Approaches to Different Molecular Classes.

Jiawen Zhu, Amy Schroeder, Sabine Frank, Christophe Boetsch, Candice Jamois, Nastya Kassir, Koorosh Korfi, Elizabeth Punnoose, Anjali Vaze, Peter Trask and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advancing Cancer-Targeted Nanotherapies with Tumor Homing Peptides.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiawen ZhuGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-1814
Amy SchroederGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Sabine FrankF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Christophe BoetschRoche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0005-8467-0339
Candice JamoisRoche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-9687
Nastya KassirGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6193-2993
Koorosh KorfiRoche Innovation Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elizabeth PunnooseGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Anjali VazeGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Peter TraskGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Pritti GosaiHoffmann-La Roche Limited, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Jane FridlyandGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Chunze LiGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8906-6553

Funding

F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncology dose optimization during the era of chemotherapy focused on identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for registrational trials, often resulting in significant toxicity. The advent of molecular targeted drugs and immunotherapies offers the potential to achieve similar efficacy with lower doses and fewer side effects, as maximal efficacy is often reached at doses below the MTD. Recent FDA guidance outlines expectations for improving dose optimization in oncology drug development. This review presents a framework for tailored dose optimization by categorizing oncology molecules into four distinct classes based on their mechanisms of action and clinical activities: small molecule targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates (Class 1), large molecule antagonists (Class 2), cancer immunotherapy agonists (Class 3), and molecules with limited or no single-agent activity (Class 4). Unique dose optimization considerations for each class are discussed, supported by illustrative case examples. To enhance robust dose decision-making and optimize patient resource utilization, we propose using proof of activity as a gate for initiating dose expansion with one or multiple dose levels. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating all relevant preclinical data, disease knowledge, and clinical measurements and highlights the essential role of quantitative pharmacology and statistical modeling in optimizing doses.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DevelopmentHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunotherapyMaximum Tolerated DoseMolecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID40248986
PMCPMC12166266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.