ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Oncology Dose Optimization: Tailored Approaches to Different Molecular Classes.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Prediction to Decision Making: PBPK and QSP as Regulatory-Grade NAMs.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Thymic epithelial tumors at the crossroads of immunity, autoimmunity, and immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Review
- Antibody-Antibiotic Conjugates: Mechanisms, Clinical Progress, and Next-Generation Strategies Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Review
- Advancing Cancer-Targeted Nanotherapies with Tumor Homing Peptides.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oncology dose optimization during the era of chemotherapy focused on identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for registrational trials, often resulting in significant toxicity. The advent of molecular targeted drugs and immunotherapies offers the potential to achieve similar efficacy with lower doses and fewer side effects, as maximal efficacy is often reached at doses below the MTD. Recent FDA guidance outlines expectations for improving dose optimization in oncology drug development. This review presents a framework for tailored dose optimization by categorizing oncology molecules into four distinct classes based on their mechanisms of action and clinical activities: small molecule targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates (Class 1), large molecule antagonists (Class 2), cancer immunotherapy agonists (Class 3), and molecules with limited or no single-agent activity (Class 4). Unique dose optimization considerations for each class are discussed, supported by illustrative case examples. To enhance robust dose decision-making and optimize patient resource utilization, we propose using proof of activity as a gate for initiating dose expansion with one or multiple dose levels. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating all relevant preclinical data, disease knowledge, and clinical measurements and highlights the essential role of quantitative pharmacology and statistical modeling in optimizing doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.