ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025
Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: international Delphi consensus.
Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo use the Delphi method to gain insight into approaches to prenatal diagnosis and management of preterm birth (PTB) in twin pregnancies, including complications such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and a short and/or dilated cervix.
methodsA three-round Delphi process was conducted among an international panel of experts to assess their approach to prevention, monitoring and management strategies for PTB in twin pregnancies. Experts were selected based on their publication record or membership of related organizations. Response options were multiple-choice answers or a five-point Likert scale. A priori, a cut-off of ≥ 70% agreement was used to define consensus.
resultsA total of 117 experts participated in the first round, of whom 94/117 (80.3%) completed all subsequent rounds. Representatives came from at least 22 countries (across five continents), most commonly the USA (50.4%) and the UK (12.0%). Over 70% of experts performed routine screening of cervical length (CL) using transvaginal ultrasound at 18-23 weeks' gestation, using CL ≤ 25 mm to diagnose short cervix in twin pregnancies, regardless of a history of PTB. In twin pregnancies with a short non-dilated cervix, most experts offered vaginal progesterone rather than pessary or cervical cerclage, regardless of a history of PTB. In twin pregnancies with asymptomatic dilated cervix, consensus was reached (88.3% agreement) for placement of cervical cerclage, performed up to 24 weeks' gestation (67.5% agreement; no consensus). Similarly, 96.1% of experts agreed that performing serial transvaginal ultrasound measurements of CL at 16-24 weeks' gestation was warranted in women with a current singleton pregnancy who had a previous twin pregnancy that required physical examination-indicated cerclage; these patients should be considered high risk for PTB (83.1% agreement). In twin pregnancies with TTTS, laser surgery is offered by most experts, regardless of preoperative CL. In patients with TTTS and short CL, most experts would recommend cervical cerclage (71.9%) or vaginal progesterone (65.6%) rather than pessary or expectant management. However, no consensus was reached on measures to prevent PTB in cases of TTTS with cervical dilation.
conclusionsThis Delphi consensus study highlights practice variations among healthcare providers worldwide in the evaluation and management of PTB in twin pregnancies, which often differ from recommendations given by national and international societies. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.