ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
A Retrospective Analysis: CCTA vs. TTE in Diagnosing Coronary Artery Fistula
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bilateral coronary artery fistulas with progressive aortic regurgitation presenting as persistent atrial fibrillation, acute heart failure and pulmonary hypertension: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare and analyze the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for coronary artery fistula (CAF) and evaluate the effectiveness of these two imaging modalities. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed imaging data from 200 patients diagnosed with CAF through surgery or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). These patients underwent CCTA and TTE examinations in our hospital. Finally, the course, origin, number, size, and location of the CAF in all patients were assessed. The diagnostic results of CCTA were compared with those of TTE, using DSA and/or surgical diagnosis as the reference standard. Results: Among the 200 patients with CAF, CCTA correctly diagnosed 156 cases, but missed 44 cases, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 78.0% (156/200). In contrast, TTE accurately diagnosed 55 cases, but missed 145 cases, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 27.5% (55/200). The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA was significantly higher than that of TTE in detecting CAF (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CCTA demonstrated significantly greater diagnostic value than TTE, demonstrating to be the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing CAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.