ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Head and Neck Imaging with a Dental CBCT Device: Comparison of 360° and 180° Rotation Angles in Effective Dose and Quantitative Image Quality in a Phantom Study
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to investigate the effect of full- and half-rotation angles on patient radiation dose and quantitative image quality in CBCT imaging of the head and neck region.
methodsA total of 67 TLDs were used for the dosimetry of 16 different regions in the head and neck slices of the anthropometric phantom. The Hyperion X9 Pro (MyRay, Cefla, Imola, Italy) CBCT device was used with a 90 kV pulsed beam and a 13x16e FOV size. Two separate imaging modes (Regular 360 0 and Quick 180 0) were tested, and the mA was determined by the software. Effective doses (EDs) were calculated using the coefficients recommended by ICRP 103 (2007). For the quantitative image quality tests, three VOIs were manually selected for three separate densities in image slices selected from the mandible, maxilla, and paranasal sinus regions of both volumes separately. Pixel values were averaged, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and uniformity tests were conducted.
resultsIn 360 0, ED was calculated as 1.903 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the oral mucosa (1.566 mSv). In 180 0, ED was calculated as 1.123 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the right temporal squamous region (0.984 mSv). The reduction in ED was found to be 41% for full- and half-rotation angles. Quick/Regular ratios for SNR and CNR were changed between 0.83-0.91.
conclusionThe magnitude of reduction in ED was found to be higher than the quantitative image quality; however, the impact of this change on diagnosis should be analyzed according to the imaging purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.