ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2025
AI-assisted identification of disability patterns within identical EDSS grades.
Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in central nervous system autoimmune diseases: from clinical decision support to mechanistic discovery and translation.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Neurostatus-Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is the most frequently used measure of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) trials. However, EDSS scores ⩾4.5 are mainly based on ambulation and may fail to capture relevant disability patterns in other functional domains.
objectiveThe objective was to determine how assessments categorized with the same EDSS score may reflect distinct disability patterns.
methodsWe analysed 13,103 assessments from 1636 people with secondary progressive MS, from the EXPAND trial. The data set is composed of Functional System scores (FSS) and their corresponding subscores, Ambulation scores and EDSS scores. We performed a descriptive analysis to define the relevant Functional Systems (FS). The subscores were then binarized based on the Neurostatus definition and grouped by respective EDSS scores. Finally, we applied two consecutive machine learning algorithms, to cluster the data. New subscore patterns were then created by aggregating clusters based on their dominant features.
resultsThe clustering algorithm yielded numerous clusters, grouping assessments with similar patterns. In patients with EDSS ⩾4.0, our approach allowed differentiation into four subscore patterns within the same EDSS score.
conclusionApplying Artificial Intelligence (AI) to large data sets of high-quality clinical assessments allows for distinguishing among different subscore patterns within identical EDSS scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.