Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248861›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2025

AI-assisted identification of disability patterns within identical EDSS grades.

Martina Greselin, Po-Jui Lu, Magdalena Mroczek, Nuria Cerdá-Fuertes, Anastasios Demirtzoglou, Athina Papadopoulou, Jens Kuhle, David Leppert, Sophie Arnould, Manar Aoun and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Martina GreselinTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-9398-5306
Po-Jui LuTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Magdalena MroczekDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nuria Cerdá-FuertesTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-5267
Anastasios DemirtzoglouDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Athina PapadopoulouTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jens KuhleDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-8892
David LeppertResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sophie ArnouldNovartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Manar AounNovartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Ludwig KapposDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-5509
Cristina GranzieraTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4917-8761
Marcus D'SouzaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5175-9541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Neurostatus-Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is the most frequently used measure of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) trials. However, EDSS scores ⩾4.5 are mainly based on ambulation and may fail to capture relevant disability patterns in other functional domains.

objectiveThe objective was to determine how assessments categorized with the same EDSS score may reflect distinct disability patterns.

methodsWe analysed 13,103 assessments from 1636 people with secondary progressive MS, from the EXPAND trial. The data set is composed of Functional System scores (FSS) and their corresponding subscores, Ambulation scores and EDSS scores. We performed a descriptive analysis to define the relevant Functional Systems (FS). The subscores were then binarized based on the Neurostatus definition and grouped by respective EDSS scores. Finally, we applied two consecutive machine learning algorithms, to cluster the data. New subscore patterns were then created by aggregating clusters based on their dominant features.

resultsThe clustering algorithm yielded numerous clusters, grouping assessments with similar patterns. In patients with EDSS ⩾4.0, our approach allowed differentiation into four subscore patterns within the same EDSS score.

conclusionApplying Artificial Intelligence (AI) to large data sets of high-quality clinical assessments allows for distinguishing among different subscore patterns within identical EDSS scores.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDisability EvaluationMachine LearningMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveSeverity of Illness IndexAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedartificial intelligenceclinical trialsdisability patternsEDSSMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID40248861
PMCPMC12092942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.