Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248830›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Measuring the social support network in autistic clients: development and validation of the Network in Action-Interview.

Rinske M van den Heuvel, Hilde M Geurts, Michel Wensing, Jan-Pieter Teunisse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rinske M van den HeuvelLeo Kannerhuis, Youz (Parnassia Group), Oosterbeek, Netherlands.
Hilde M GeurtsLeo Kannerhuis, Youz (Parnassia Group), Oosterbeek, Netherlands.
Michel WensingGeneral Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan-Pieter TeunisseLeo Kannerhuis, Youz (Parnassia Group), Oosterbeek, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As social relationships are intertwined with mental health recovery, it is important to address a client's social support network during mental health interventions. This seems even more important for autistic clients, because research suggests they have on average smaller networks and experience more loneliness than non-autistic individuals. Therefore, an interview assessing the social support network in relation to intervention goals was co-created together with stakeholders (autistic clients, mental healthcare professionals and a mother of an autistic client). In addition, the psychometric properties and acceptability of this Network-in-Action-Interview (NiA-I) were studied as pre-registered (AsPredicted #59767). Methods: The Nominal Group Technique was used to co-create the NiA-I with stakeholders and it was administered to autistic clients ( Results: Network-in-Action-Interview social support scores were significantly correlated with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, indicating sufficient convergent validity. Clients and professionals reported that the NiA-I provided the therapist with greater insight into the client's social support network. Professionals reported the NiA-I could be improved regarding administration duration. Discussion: This cross-sectional study shows that the NiA-I is a solid and helpful tool for including the social network in clinical practice. Addressing and including a client's social support network is important for recovery-focused mental health treatment. The NiA-I can assist professionals in taking such actions.

Indexed as

adultsautismmental healthcaresocial networksocial support

Identifiers

PMID40248830
PMCPMC12003415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.