ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison of two different intrathecal morphine doses for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Postoperative pain is one of the most common problems after thoracic surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (ITM) based on ideal body weight in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Material and Methods: Forty-six patients scheduled for elective lung resection were included in this study. Patients were allocated to receive 10 μg/kg (Group I) and 7 μg/kg (Group II) ITM according to the ideal body weight for postoperative analgesia. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores (at rest and effort), side effects, and additional analgesic requirements were recorded. Results: Postoperative pain scores did not differ in the first 12 h between the groups, but were significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at 18 and 24 hours ( Conclusions: The use of 10 μg/kg ITM according to the ideal body weight provides more effective analgesia without increasing the side effects compared to 7 μg/kg ITM after VATS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.