ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Cone-beam computed tomography reconstruction for a commercial proton beam therapy system.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Purpose: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are used in image-guided radiotherapy to track anatomical changes throughout treatment and to set up patients to ensure accurate delivery of therapeutic radiation at each treatment session. An offline method of CBCT reconstruction workflow, operating on 2D projection images and specific to the imaging system in question, is needed for many image optimisation studies. Here we present a methodology to reconstruct CBCT images from these data for a commercial proton beam therapy machine, accounting for the variation in exposure and beam hardening from filtration due to gantry rotation during CBCT acquisition. Materials & Methods: Projection data of solid water phantoms were acquired to model bow-tie filter motion and beam hardening effects. Projection data and system CBCT reconstructions of a Catphan504 phantom were acquired for validation of the method, as well as a retrospectively accessed patient image. The presented workflow was assessed against the clinical reconstructions using uniformity, signal-to-noise-ratio, and contrast-to-noise-ratio measured in the phantom images. Results: The offline workflow eliminated crescent artefacts due to variable exposure and beam hardening in phantom and patient images. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were similar compared to system reconstructions, although with slight differences thought to be due to interplay effects in the bow-tie filter. Conclusion: A workflow was developed to emulate the CBCT reconstruction process for a commercial proton therapy machine, providing a useful tool for optimised acquisition parameters and novel reconstruction processes using this system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.