Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248763›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Comparative analysis of nnU-Net and Auto3Dseg for fat and fibroglandular tissue segmentation in MRI.

Yasna Forghani, Rafaela Timóteo, Tiago Marques, Nuno Loução, Maria João Cardoso, Fátima Cardoso, Mario Figueiredo, Pedro Gouveia, João Santinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yasna ForghaniChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Digital Surgery Lab, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0515-7146
Rafaela TimóteoChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Digital Surgery Lab, Lisboa, Portugal.
Tiago MarquesChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Digital Surgery Lab, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-0549
Nuno LouçãoChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Digital Surgery Lab, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria João CardosoChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Breast Unit, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8137-3700
Fátima CardosoChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Breast Unit, Lisboa, Portugal.
Mario FigueiredoUniversidade de Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-7745
Pedro GouveiaChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Digital Surgery Lab, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5600-2783
João SantinhaChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Digital Surgery Lab, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-2943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer, the most common cancer type among women worldwide, requires early detection and accurate diagnosis for improved treatment outcomes. Segmenting fat and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for creating volumetric models, enhancing surgical workflow, and improving clinical outcomes. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and subjective, prompting the development of automated deep-learning algorithms to perform this task. However, configuring these algorithms for 3D medical images is challenging due to variations in image features and preprocessing distortions. Automated machine learning (AutoML) frameworks automate model selection, hyperparameter tuning, and architecture optimization, offering a promising solution by reducing reliance on manual intervention and expert knowledge. Approach: We compare nnU-Net and Auto3Dseg, two AutoML frameworks, in segmenting fat and FGT on T1-weighted MRI images from the Duke breast MRI dataset (100 patients). We used threefold cross-validation, employing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) metrics for evaluation. The Results: nnU-Net achieved DSC scores of Conclusions: Ensemble approaches of Auto3Dseg and nnU-Net demonstrated comparable performance in segmenting fat and FGT on breast MRI. The significant differences in fat HD underscore the importance of boundary-focused metrics in evaluating segmentation methods.

Indexed as

Auto3DSegbreast MRI segmentationfibroglandular tissue segmentationmedical image segmentationnnU-Net

Identifiers

PMID40248763
PMCPMC12003052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.