ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2025
Small samples, big problems-the inability to provide a sample in breath alcohol testing: Case reports.
Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Same pattern, different result: Algorithmic inconsistency in breath alcohol testing-case reports.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Errors in toxicology testing and the need for full discovery.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breath alcohol testing is a cornerstone of impaired driving investigations, yet some individuals are physiologically unable to provide adequate breath samples, leading to charges of refusal despite efforts to comply. This paper presents seven case reports of individuals who failed to meet the minimum volume requirements of the DataMaster DMT breath alcohol analyzer due to factors such as age, gender, respiratory conditions, and smoking history. Despite seemingly genuine attempts to provide valid samples, these individuals were charged with refusing to submit to a chemical test. The case reports in this paper highlight the vulnerabilities in current testing protocols, including the one-size-fits-all volume requirement, equipment problems, measurement uncertainty, individual anxiety, operator bias, and lack of transparency. Proposed improvements include alternative testing methods (e.g., blood or urine), individualized volume requirements, enhanced operator training, slope-based sampling, changes in equipment design, regular volume calibration, mandatory data collection, and independent scientific review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.