ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Short-term peri- and intra-tumoral CT radiomics to predict immunotherapy response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a radiomics-habitat model for preoperatively predicting poorly differentiated stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- CT radiomics machine learning for predicting treatment response in unresectable stage III-IV NSCLC: insights from dual chemo-immunotherapy and immunotherapy cohorts.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- PET/CT imaging for assessment of tumor immunotherapy response: a new perspective on tumor metabolic reprogramming and immune escape.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Association between intra- and peritumoral heterogeneity on B-mode ultrasound and overall survival in patients with liver metastases treated with immunotherapy.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Medical imaging in immunotherapy response evaluation: from RECIST to AI-driven longitudinal models, and the distinction between risk prediction and kinetic diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Radiomics and deep learning for immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes: imaging-derived immune phenotyping and clinical translation across solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Omics-Mediated Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer: Moving Towards Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting response to immunotherapy is crucial for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment planning, but effective predictive markers for immunotherapy efficacy are still lacking. This study aimed to develop an explainable machine learning model for predicting immunotherapy responses in advanced NSCLC patients. Methods: A total of 245 advanced NSCLC patients from two centers who received immunotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. For each primary tumor, three regions of interest were analyzed, namely, the intratumoral region (ITR), peritumoral region (PTR), and combined intratumoral and PTR (IPTR). Pre-radiomics features and delta-radiomics features reflecting the rate of change between radiomics features before and after treatment were extracted. Models for predicting immunotherapy responses were established via the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier and assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) tool was employed to explore the interpretability of the model. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of the prediction models. Results: The delta-radiomics models of ITR and IPTR demonstrated optimal performance in predicting immunotherapy response, significantly improving the area under the curve (AUC) to 0.85 and 0.83 in the internal validation cohort and 0.84 and 0.86 in the external validation cohort. SHAP revealed a strong relationship between the delta-radiomics feature values and the model-predicted probabilities. KM curves indicated that the high-risk groups identified by the delta-radiomics models had significantly worse PFS than did the low-risk groups across all cohorts. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that a model based on multiple time points outperformed one based on a single time point. The delta-radiomics model has been proved a noninvasive approach for assessing the response of advanced NSCLC patients to immunotherapy and facilitates individualized treatment decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.