ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2025
Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection by ctDNA testing in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Clinical value of blood circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) in liquid biopsy of lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Clinical significance of serum levels of 14-3-3β protein in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy in urological cancer: insights from a retrospective cohort.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: A Liquid Biopsy Revolution for Non-Invasive Genomic Profiling and Clinical Decision-Making.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsies for detection, characterization, and interception of therapy resistance in thoracic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Perioperative EGFR-Targeted Therapy in Resectable EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: A Narrative Review from Drug Design to Pain-Informed MRD-Guided Care.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Characteristics of Oligo-Recurrence and Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: In recent years, significant advancements have been achieved in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), leading to prolonged patient survival; however, a subset of NSCLC patients may experience recurrence or distant metastasis following initial successful treatment. This phenomenon may be attributed to the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) that remains undetectable by conventional imaging or laboratory techniques post-treatment. The potential sources of tumor recurrence (MRD), are significantly associated with adverse patient prognosis; therefore, the monitoring of these lesions is critically important in the management of NSCLC. This review seeks to examine the current evidence regarding the application of MRD in NSCLC clinical practice, as well as the challenges encountered in its role as a biomarker. Methods: We performed a narrative review by systematically searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases for pertinent literature published from 2005 to 2024, with the objective of identifying significant literature related to clinical research and detection techniques for MRD in NSCLC. Key Content and Findings: The detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for MRD has emerged as a significant focus in high-sensitivity genetic testing for monitoring NSCLC. This method may facilitate the assessment of recurrence risk in NSCLC and inform clinical decision-making to identify high-risk patients who are likely to benefit from treatment, thereby providing a rationale for treatment escalation or de-escalation. Nevertheless, the clinical application of ctDNA MRD continues to encounter several challenges, among which improving detection sensitivity and selecting the best detection timing are urgent issues that need to be addressed. Conclusions: ctDNA MRD testing offers robust evidence to assist clinicians in the early identification of NSCLC recurrence and in guiding clinical treatment. We recommend integrating ctDNA MRD with traditional biomarkers and imaging modalities for a comprehensive evaluation aiming at optimizing treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.