Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248640›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dermatology

Amelanotic Melanoma Arising in Surgical Cicatrix: A Case Report.

Anna Louise Norling, Christian Beltoft Brøchner, Linnea Langhans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna Louise NorlingDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian Beltoft BrøchnerDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Linnea LanghansDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Amelanotic melanoma (AM) is a rare subtype of melanoma characterized by the absence of pigmentation, making it difficult to diagnose. This case report describes AM arising in a cicatrix following cardiac surgery, highlighting diagnostic challenges and the importance of reassessment when the clinical findings do not fit the initial diagnosis. Case Presentation: A 76-year-old male underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in March 2022. Nine months later, he noticed a mass with ulceration in the sternal cicatrix. A punch biopsy showed inflammation and fibrosis, leading to a diagnosis of suture granuloma. Despite the lesion's progression over 8 months, no further biopsies or treatments were performed. In September 2023, the patient was referred to the Department of Plastic Surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, where an excision biopsy revealed an AM with a thickness of 20 mm. Preoperative PET-CT showed no evidence of metastasis, and re-excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Adjuvant oncologic treatment was administered due to a positive sentinel node. Conclusion: This case emphasizes the diagnostic challenges of AM, especially when arising in a cicatrix. When the clinical picture does not align with the initial diagnosis, it is crucial to reconsider and conduct further evaluations to avoid delays in treatment.

Indexed as

Amelanotic melanomaCase reportCicatrixMarjolin’s ulcerNeoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40248640
PMCPMC12005706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.