ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2025
[Origin of Syphilis in Europe: End of a Controversy?]
Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upon Christopher Columbus's return, an unknown disease was discovered in Barcelona, Spain, in 1493, before appearing in Naples, Italy, in 1494/1495 during a war with France. Initially described among the troops, it quickly spread throughout Europe as the armies withdrew. The question arises whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship with Columbus's return to Spain or if it is merely a coincidence, as syphilis seems to have been present in Europe before Europeans arrived in the Americas, though it may not have been identified as such. This would explain why it was not clearly recognized by the population or described in the available literature. Recently, archaeological and paleopathological research on human remains from the modern era, supported by genetic data, has clearly established the presence of syphilis in ancient Europe. These findings also suggest that syphilis may not have existed in the Americas during Columbus's time. However, it seems possible that Columbus's companions brought back to Europe a non-venereal strain of treponematosis, which could have mutated while adapting to new environmental conditions, increasing its pathogenicity and altering its mode of transmission when transferred to new individuals, possibly prostitutes. In turn, this venereal syphilis strain may have infected the American continent during the Spanish conquests and/or the transatlantic slave trade. This study provides some recent arguments to fuel the controversy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.