ArticleRadiologia brasileira
Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for cervical lymph node metastasis from oral cancer.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis from oral cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Radiology Department of the Mayo Hospital, in the city of Lahore, Pakistan. We included 150 patients diagnosed with oral cancer. Ages ranged from 18 to 60 years of age. During the study period, all of the patients included underwent magnetic resonance imaging, including a DWI sequence, in a 1.5-T scanner with a phased-array head and neck coil. Patients with contraindications to magnetic resonance (aneurysm, a pacemaker, clips, plates, a prosthetic valve, or claustrophobia) were excluded. In the DWI sequence, the area scanned included the lymph nodes from suprasternal notch to the base of the skull. Histopathology of the lymph nodes was employed as the gold standard. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of DWI for the diagnosis of oral cancer metastasis to cervical lymph nodes, with histopathology as the gold standard, was 90.57%, 91.75%, 94.68%, 90.57%, and 91.33%, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that DWI is fairly accurate for detecting metastases in the cervical lymph nodes of patients with oral cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.