Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248572›Full record

ArticleNature physics2025

Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer.

Michael Meth, Jinglei Zhang, Jan F Haase, Claire Edmunds, Lukas Postler, Andrew J Jena, Alex Steiner, Luca Dellantonio, Rainer Blatt, Peter Zoller and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Qudit-Native Simulation of the Potts Model.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Aharonov-Bohm interference in aNature physics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael MethUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-3962
Jinglei ZhangInstitute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-7921
Jan F HaaseInstitute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-8216
Claire EdmundsUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2367-9074
Lukas PostlerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.
Andrew J JenaInstitute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
Alex SteinerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5443-7871
Luca DellantonioInstitute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1914-6539
Rainer BlattUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-2461
Peter ZollerInstitute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4014-1505
Thomas MonzUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7410-4804
Philipp SchindlerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9461-9650
Christine MuschikInstitute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
Martin RingbauerUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-6240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle physics describes the interplay of matter and forces through gauge theories. Yet, the intrinsic quantum nature of gauge theories makes important problems notoriously difficult for classical computational techniques. Quantum computers offer a promising way to overcome these roadblocks. We demonstrate two essential requirements on this path: first, we perform a quantum computation of the properties of the basic building block of two-dimensional lattice quantum electrodynamics, involving both gauge fields and matter. Second, we show how to refine the gauge-field discretization beyond its minimal representation, using a trapped-ion qudit quantum processor, where quantum information is encoded in several states per ion. Such qudits are ideally suited for describing gauge fields, which are naturally high dimensional, leading to reduced register size and circuit complexity. We prepare the ground state of the model using a variational quantum eigensolver and observe the effect of dynamical matter on quantized magnetic fields. By controlling the qudit dimension, we also show how to seamlessly observe the effect of different gauge-field truncations. Finally, we experimentally study the dynamics of pair creation and magnetic energy. Our results open the door for hardware-efficient quantum simulations of gauge theories with qudits in near-term quantum devices.

Indexed as

Quantum informationQuantum simulation

Identifiers

PMID40248572
PMCPMC11999872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.