ArticleCureus2025
Outcomes of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Dropped Head Syndrome in a Single Institution: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a prognostic scoring system for Conservative treatment outcomes in idiopathic neck extensor Myopathy-Dropped head syndrome.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dropped head syndrome (DHS), also known as camptocephalia, is characterized by a mobile chin-on-chest deformity from hypotonia of the cervical extensor muscle or hypertonia of the anterior neck muscles. There remains a paucity of quality published literature on this topic, particularly its management. The objective of this study is to identify radiographic and clinical outcomes of surgery as compared to nonsurgical treatment, to summarize the literature, and to create a decision-making paradigm for managing patients with DHS. As such, we report outcomes of our retrospective chart review series as well as a literature review on the etiology, management options, and outcomes. In our series, we examined the radiographic parameters of the C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope, as well as clinically reported outcomes of conservatively managed (CM; N = 8) and surgically managed (SM; N = 5) interventions on 13 patients with DHS at a single institution. At initial presentation, the CM group had poorer C2-C7 Cobb angle (-37.8 ± 3.2 degrees) and C2-C7 SVA (77.1 ± 10.6 mm) in comparison to the SM group (-21.0 ± 30.3 degrees and 56.9 ± 16.2 mm, respectively). We found a statistically significant improvement in the C2-C7 Cobb angle and T1 slope (p-value of 0.024 and 0.019, respectively) after surgery. Clinically, only one patient in the CM group (20%) reported improvement versus six patients in the SM group (80%). Our study is limited by its small sample size, albeit it is the largest cohort of patients treated at a single institution in the United States to our knowledge. Although our cohort was comprised of heterogeneous etiologies and patient comorbidities, we found that surgery can be beneficial in the right patient. To aid in proper surgical selection, we provide an algorithm for workup and management of DHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.