ArticleCureus2025
Resilience Differences Among Health Professionals: Examining the Impact of Body Image Appreciation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBody image (BI) is a determinant of mental health and has a strong association with self-esteem and self-worth, core elements of resilience. The relationship between BI appreciation and resilience in health professionals (HPs) remains largely unexplored.
aimThe aim of the study was to compare HPs' resilience and determine the relationship of resilience with BI appreciation.
methodsA cross-sectional comparative study was conducted using an online questionnaire that was completed by 484 HPs that included a) demographic and occupational characteristics, b) the Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2), and c) the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). Data was collected between January and March 2024.
resultsNurses reported significantly higher BI (3.96 ± 0.60 vs. 3.45 ± 0.73, p < 0.001) and resilience (3.25 ± 0.64 vs. 2.98 ± 0.55, p < 0.001) compared to physicians. Multiple regression analysis identified BI as a strong positive predictor of resilience for both nurses and physicians (p < 0.001). Nurses' resilience was also positively associated with increased working experience (p = 0.001) and negatively with the managerial position (p < 0.001) and higher level of education (p = 0.003). Physicians' resilience was also positively linked to cohabitation (p = 0.001) and the existence of children (p = 0.006) while negatively associated with working in internal departments (p = 0.001).
conclusionsBI appreciation appears to play a significant role in HPs' resilience, while professional and personal factors influence each group differently. Interventions targeting in enhancing BI appreciation among HPs are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.