ArticleCureus2025
Intracranial Pressure During Mobilization in a Patient With Postoperative Putaminal Hemorrhage: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation and mobilization for patients with severe stroke, including postsurgical cases, are considered feasible if the intracranial pressure (ICP) remains below 20 mmHg. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated real-time ICP changes during mobilization in patients with postoperative putaminal hemorrhage. In this case report, we detail the ICP fluctuations observed during mobilization in a patient with postoperative putaminal hemorrhage. A 47-year-old man was diagnosed with left putaminal hemorrhage and underwent emergency craniotomy for hematoma evacuation (day 1). Postoperatively, the patient was managed using continuous ICP monitoring. Mobilization (sitting on the edge of the bed) began on day 3, during which time the ICP was evaluated. The preintervention ICP was well controlled, ranging from 13 to 15 mmHg. During the transition to the sitting position, the patient attempted to rise on his own, leading to a transient ICP elevation exceeding 20 mmHg for approximately 20 seconds. While maintaining the sitting position, the ICP stabilized at approximately 5 mmHg without sustained elevation. The blood pressure, heart rate, and other vital signs remained stable throughout the intervention period. Our findings suggest that mobilization to a sitting position may be feasible without inducing sustained ICP elevation when ICP is well controlled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.