ReviewCureus2025
How the Metaverse Is Shaping the Future of Healthcare Communication: A Tool for Enhancement or a Barrier to Effective Interaction?
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metaverse-based objective structured clinical examinations: an exploratory approach to advancing clinical competency assessment.Korean journal of medical education · 2026Article
- Metaverse and Immersive Technologies: Redefining the Future of Healthcare: A Scoping Review.International journal of preventive medicine · 2026Review
- Anatomy at the threshold: Teaching the human body in a hybrid age.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
- Multidimensional challenges in promoting acupuncture for insomnia: Cultural, economic, and patient provider trust perspectives.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Immersive futures in healthcare: A mapping review of review articles on the metaverse.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The metaverse is emerging as a transformative force in healthcare communication, integrating virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), artificial intelligence (AI), and extended reality to enhance doctor-patient interactions, interprofessional collaboration, medical education, and surgical planning. By providing immersive, interactive, and data-driven environments, the metaverse could facilitate real-time consultations, remote surgical assistance, and simulation-based training, overcoming traditional geographical and logistical barriers. Despite these advancements, skepticism persists regarding the metaverse's true benefit in fostering meaningful human interaction. Some critics argue that virtual interfaces risk alienating communication, eroding the depth of doctor-patient relationships rather than strengthening them. The concern remains that digital mediation might replace rather than enhance human presence, diminishing the nuances of empathy and trust inherent in face-to-face interactions. Economic constraints, technological disparities, and the potential reduction in direct human interaction can complicate widespread adoption. Some perspectives suggest that, if strategically implemented, the metaverse could foster a more human, authentic, and profound doctor-patient relationship by reducing administrative burdens and allowing physicians to focus more on patient care. While the metaverse holds promise for revolutionizing digital healthcare, its long-term success depends on responsible implementation, equitable access, and strategic integration into existing healthcare frameworks. In this paper, we aim to critically evaluate both sides of this debate, synthesizing existing evidence to clarify the role of the metaverse in future healthcare communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.