ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Return to recreational activity after hip abductor repair: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Variability in United States online rehabilitation protocols after open and endoscopic hip abductor repair.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hip abductor tears are a relatively common pathology that can impede activity and quality of life. Surgical repair may confer a greater ability to return to recreational activities; however, to our knowledge no systematic reviews have been conducted exploring this. The purpose of this study is to describe the ability to return to recreation following hip abductor repair, and identify any patient factors affecting post-surgical prognosis. Methods: A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies published on and prior to February 15th, 2024 was conducted using Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (EBSCO) in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. The search included a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary for the following concepts: Results: Across 5 studies, a total of 474 patients (41 males, 433 females) with a history of recreational activity and mean age of 69.92 years underwent repair. Two studies reported the number of patients returning to recreation, yielding a return rate of 76 %, with walking having the highest return (N = 26), and skiing, soccer, and horse-riding seeing no return. There was no difference in return based on procedural technique or concomitant procedures ( Conclusion: With an aging population and a growing desire to maintain elevated levels of physical activity, the importance of assessing return to recreation following hip abductor repair is increasingly crucial. This study demonstrates a relatively high satisfaction rate while also underscoring a greater need to report specific activities when discussing postsurgical return to recreation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.