Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248475›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of emergency medicine

Surgical versus conservative management for traumatic brain injury in elderly patients: A propensity-matched cohort study.

Gunaseelan Rajendran, Sasikumar Mahalingam, Anitha Ramkumar, Kumaresh Pillur Tamilarasu, Rahini Kannan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of emergency medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gunaseelan RajendranDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Missions' Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-209X
Sasikumar MahalingamDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Missions' Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-8388
Anitha RamkumarDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Missions' Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2177-5329
Kumaresh Pillur TamilarasuDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Missions' Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-3289
Rahini KannanDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Vinayaka Missions' Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7893-3182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe management of traumatic brain injury in elderly patients remains a topic of conflicting evidence in the literature. While some studies suggest that surgical intervention is beneficial, others indicate increased mortality and morbidity. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective matched cohort study to further investigate the role of surgical and conservative management for traumatic brain injury in elderly individuals.

methodsThe authors conducted a retrospective review comparing patients with traumatic brain injury who underwent nonoperative management (NOM) versus those who underwent operative management (OM). Case matching was employed to create an artificial control group matched for age, sex, noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) findings, and symptoms at a 1:1 ratio of treatment to control. The inclusion criteria included patients aged 60 years and above who presented to the emergency medicine department with head injuries resulting from various causes, such as road traffic accidents, falls, or assault, whereas the exclusion criteria included polytrauma, severe hypovolemic shock, and referrals to other institutions. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores, with statistical significance set at

resultsOptimal case matching was achieved for 52 out of 96 patients who underwent surgical management. There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between patients who underwent surgical management (32.69%) and those who did not (28.82%). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the GOS score at 1 month between the two groups. A subgroup analysis based on the severity of traumatic brain injury and radiological diagnosis of intracranial injury revealed no difference between the OM and NOM groups, except for patients who underwent midline shift surgery.

conclusionThere was no difference in all-cause mortality among elderly patients with traumatic brain injury regardless of whether they received conservative or surgical management, except for patients who underwent midline shift surgery.

Indexed as

All-cause mortalityGlasgow Outcome Scalenonoperative managementpropensity-matched cohorttraumatic brain injury in elderly individuals

Identifiers

PMID40248475
PMCPMC12002146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.