ArticleMethodsX2025
Persistent free radicals in leaves as a stable standard for quantifying free radicals.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored plant-derived biogenic persistent free radicals (BPFRs) in crape myrtle leaves as an alternative standard to 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for quantifying organic radicals. Conventional methods rely on DPPH as a standard but are prone to degradation due to light, temperature, and humidity fluctuations. We performed electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements on both DPPH and leaf samples at various masses, temperatures (22 °C and 35 °C), and relative humidity (∼100 % RH) to evaluate radical stability. We observed consistent linear responses with increasing sample mass for crape myrtle leaves, similar to the behavior of DPPH. However, the BPFRs remained more stable under high temperature and humidity over seven days, retaining most of their radical signals compared to DPPH. The g-factor of crape myrtle leaves remained nearly constant, indicating no significant alteration in the paramagnetic center. The peak-to-peak linewidth varied slightly, reflecting minor environmental and sample preparation differences. These findings suggest that BPFRs in plant tissue are more robust standards. Implementing leaf-derived radicals as calibration references may enhance reproducibility in free radical quantification, reduce artifacts from DPPH degradation, and support broader environmental or biological applications.•BPFRs in crape myrtle leaves exhibited excellent stability under elevated temperatures and humidity compared to DPPH, maintaining their radical signals over seven days.•BPFRs demonstrated a consistent linear response with increasing sample mass, similar to DPPH, making them a viable alternative for free radical quantification.•Using leaf-derived radicals as calibration standards may enhance reproducibility in free radical quantification and mitigate artifacts from the degradation of DPPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.