Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248459›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2025

A matter of measurement? A Swedish register-based study of migrant residential segregation and all-cause mortality.

Agneta Cederström, Andrea Dunlavy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agneta CederströmDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrea DunlavyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent decades, Sweden has become an increasingly diverse society by origin, but one in which residential segregation by migrant background has also increased. This study examines how different aspects of migrant residential segregation are associated with all-cause mortality among native-born and migrant populations. Methods: Using Swedish population-based registers, this longitudinal open cohort study assessed associations between four local level indices of migrant residential segregation and all-cause mortality among adult migrant and native-born residents of Sweden's three largest metropolitan areas (Stockholm, Gothenburg, and Malmö) between 2004 and 2016. Multilevel Poisson regression models, adjusted for individual-level sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors as well as area-level socioeconomic conditions, were used to estimate associations between these indices and all-cause mortality. Results: Moderate decreased mortality risks were observed among migrants in residential areas with higher levels of migrant density, isolation, and exposure in fully adjusted models. However, isolation and exposure effects could not be distinguished due to a high degree of correlation between the isolation and exposure measures. In fully adjusted models mortality gradients were largely unobserved among native-born individuals in relation to migrant residential segregation. The evenness dimension of segregation showed limited relevance for mortality risk in both groups. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that higher migrant density is associated with lower mortality risks among migrants, suggesting that residential areas with higher proportions of migrants may offer health benefits for migrants. These findings highlight the importance of residential contexts in shaping migrant health outcomes.

Indexed as

All-cause mortalityMeasurementMigrationResidential segregationSweden

Identifiers

PMID40248459
PMCPMC12005324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.