ArticleZooKeys2025
Systematics of the braconid wasp subfamily Rhysipolinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) based on UCE data, with the description of a new Neotropical genus.
Article in ZooKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhysipolinae is a small cosmopolitan cyclostome subfamily of braconid wasps, currently comprising 10 genera and more than 80 species. The two species of the subfamily whose biology has been confirmed are koinobiont ectoparasitoids of lepidopteran larvae, deviating from the two common parasitoid strategies in Braconidae (koinobiont-endoparasitoid, idiobiont-ectoparasitoid). Defining the limits of Rhysipolinae has been challenging due to the lack of exclusive morphological features and difficulties in resolving its phylogenetic relationships based on both morphological and Sanger DNA sequence data. However, recent phylogenomic studies using nuclear ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and mitochondrial genome sequences have begun to clarify its relationships, although various generic boundaries remain unclear. Here a phylogenomic analysis based on UCE data was performed including 32 species of nine rhysipoline genera to assess the monophyly of the subfamily as well as its generic limits. Our phylogenetic analysis confirmed the monophyly of Rhysipolinae, but no unique external morphological features were found for its diagnosis. Most genera were recovered as monophyletic except
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.