ArticleCureus2025
Rehabilitating a Complex Mid-facial Defect With an Interim, Magnet-Retained, Two-Piece Acrylic Prosthesis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mid-facial defects, which often communicate with intraoral maxillary defects, pose significant challenges for prosthetic rehabilitation. An 80-year-old male reported for orofacial rehabilitation following multiple resections for recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma. The chief concerns include facial appearance, mastication, speech, swallowing, nasal regurgitation, and oral fluid leakage. Examination revealed a complex left-sided mid-facial defect involving the maxilla, infratemporal fossa, and lateral nasal wall, with an intraoral-external communication. Complications included fibrotic tissue healing, trismus, and mandibular deviation. Surgical reconstruction was contraindicated. An interim, magnet-retained, two-piece acrylic prosthesis was fabricated with a palatal obturator without artificial teeth for the intraoral defect and a cheek prosthesis for the external defect. The cheek prosthesis improved facial appearance, while the palatal obturator sealed the intraoral defect, enhancing swallowing and preventing nasal regurgitation and oral fluid leakage; however, mastication and speech were affected. The patient continued with a semi-solid diet and was able to masticate using the remaining dentition. The palatal obturator slightly improved speech by sealing the defect, although slurring persisted. The combined anatomical support and magnetic retention enhanced the retention, stability, and support of the prosthesis. This non-invasive and cost-effective solution was tailored to meet the patient's specific needs and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.