ReviewHealth science reports2025
Prevalence of Babies Born With Neural Tube Defects and Geospatial Mapping of Therapeutic Services: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Neural tube defects (NTDs) are an important global health concern with high morbidity and mortality. Enhancing access to healthcare for children born with NTDs is crucial for improving health systems and service delivery. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to assess the global prevalence of NTDs and the accessibility of healthcare services. Our search spanned databases like PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus, focusing on NTD prevalence, healthcare service mapping, and access barriers. We followed a standardized data extraction process, and the study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023425843). Results: From 3067 records, 65 studies met our inclusion criteria, mainly focusing on newborns. The study durations range from 6 months to 40 years. The NTD prevalence was between 0.4 and 215.13 per 10,000 births, with Spina Bifida, Anencephaly, and Encephalocele being the most common. The African region was the WHO region with the highest prevalence, while the Western Pacific Region had the lowest prevalence. One study used geospatial mapping to identify healthcare access barriers. Conclusion: Our study revealed wide disparities in the prevalence rates of NTDs with the African region having the highest prevalence. Geospatial mapping was not used to assess access to healthcare services for children born with NTDs in almost all the studies. This underscores the global challenge of access to surgical care for children born with NTDs and the need for strengthening healthcare services in settings with high prevalences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.