ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2025
Effects of El Niño and the Positive Indian Ocean Dipole (+IOD) on Health, Food Security, Economics, and Conflict in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Indo-Pacific: A Systematic Review.
Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate drivers such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) can impact multiple sectors globally. We are currently witnessing the effects of these teleconnections against the backdrop of a changing climate. This systematic review takes stock of the available evidence on compounding and cascading effects of El Niño and the Positive IOD on health, economic, migration, conflicts, and nutrition outcomes in low- and middle-income countries from the Indo-Pacific region. The review sheds light on how effects vary between and within the considered countries and explores potential sources of heterogeneity. The search of studies was carried out in January 2024 in 12 major databases/search engines and 14 institutional websites, using English keywords, and paired by forward and backward citation tracking of the included studies. The review's inclusion criteria encompassed quantitative studies as long as they provide an estimate of relationship between the climate driver and outcome, and qualitative studies that aim to infer causation such as realist evaluation or process tracing. The analysis used a combination of meta-analysis with random-effects models, median effects from correlational and regression studies, and narrative synthesis. We found that El Niño is likely to decrease agricultural production and productivity at the Indo-Pacific level, although the analysed studies are highly diverse. The absence of evidence on the effects of the considered climate drivers on migration, conflict, food security and nutrition is an important evidence gap. We found limited evidence on the differential effects by El Niño's and +IOD's magnitude and no studies examining their combined impact or qualitative effectiveness studies. The high risk of bias detected across studies calls for more thorough attention to study design, conduct, and reporting in answering questions about effects. Despite remaining evidence gaps, this review highlights potential effects of El Niño and +IOD in the Indo-Pacific and underscores the need for context-specific policy responses to mitigate risks at local and regional levels. Caution is warranted in interpreting the overall findings given the generally high risk of bias of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.