ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Present and future of endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac amyloidosis.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of cardiac amyloidosis on survival in aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVR: a systematic review and reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Segmental and global amyloid burden and myocardial mechanics: a multimodality imaging comparison.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Amyloidosis and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Update on Diagnostic and Management Considerations.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Review
- Endomyocardial Biopsy Revisited: Diagnostic Value and Expanding Roles in Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Non-Invasive Diagnostic Algorithm in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: Is Bone Scintigraphy Always Enough?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cardiac Amyloidosis in the Real World: Clinical Presentations, Disease Overlap, and Therapeutic Imperatives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) affects the myocardium, vessels, valves, and epi-pericardium. Guidelines and expert consensus documents provide recommendations for the diagnostic work-up, which has the dual purpose of confirming the presence of amyloid deposits and characterizing the amyloidogenic protein. Amyloid typing is essential for treatments targeting the different types of amyloidosis, mainly transthyretin (ATTR, the most common type) and light chain, and less commonly reactive-serum amyloid-A, and beta2-microglobulin. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), still considered the gold standard for diagnosing and typing amyloid, is primarily reserved for cases where non-invasive tools do not provide a definitive diagnosis. Interestingly, while EMB was expected to decline, its numbers have increased globally over the past decade. This trend was driven by the greater awareness of CA, the novel epidemiology of CA with exponentially increased ATTRwt, the limitations of non-invasive methods in diagnosing early-stage ATTR CA, and the need to diagnose and type CAs that are not identified through alternative tools. Looking ahead, it is anticipated that EMB will continue to play a crucial role in diagnosing CA. This review explores the current diagnostic role of EMB, and potential applications in early CA, in differential diagnoses, in detecting and typing rare CA, as well as in incidental findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.