Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248302›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Upgrade on atrial fibrillation ablation in the new ESC Guidelines.

Silvia Magnani, Hussam Ali, Riccardo Cappato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Silvia MagnaniArrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy.
Hussam AliArrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo CappatoArrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical guidelines (GLs) are crafted by professional medical societies with the primary goal of supporting healthcare providers in making informed decisions during routine clinical practice. These GLs serve as practical tools, offering evidence-based recommendations that help clinicians navigate complex scenarios in patient care. By synthesizing the latest scientific evidence and expert consensus, they provide a structured framework for diagnosing, managing, and preventing various medical conditions. This ensures that clinical decision-making is consistent, effective, and aligned with current best practices, ultimately promoting high-quality care and better patient outcomes in everyday healthcare settings. This paper aims to emphasize the importance of updating the European Society of Cardiology 2020 GLs, particularly in light of advances and evolving evidence in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). It examines the key updates introduced in the 2024 GLs, with a specific focus on AF ablation, highlighting the changes and advancements that address gaps or enhance clinical practices. Additionally, the paper explores potential future directions for refining these GLs, considering emerging research, evolving technologies, and practical challenges in their implementation including new editing methods.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCatheter ablationGuidelines

Identifiers

PMID40248302
PMCPMC12001759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.