Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248301›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

From the SELECT study to SOUL: different administration methods of semaglutide but same efficacy?

Laura Gatto, Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè, Antonio Emanuele Lentini, Lorenzo Scalia, Francesco Prati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura GattoCardiovascular Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Flavio Giuseppe BiccirèCardiovascular Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonio Emanuele LentiniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Campus Bio Medico, Rome.
Lorenzo ScaliaCenter for the Fight against Heart Attack-CLI Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PratiCardiovascular Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is a well-established agent in managing patients with high cardiovascular risk. Initially, a formulation was introduced for weekly subcutaneous administration that demonstrated good tolerability and excellent efficacy in controlling glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in reducing body weight in obese and/or overweight subjects, even non-diabetics. Subsequent evidence has shown that the advantages of this drug go beyond simple glucose homoeostasis and weight reduction. Several randomized clinical trials have, in fact, highlighted the effect of semaglutide on improving cardiovascular outcomes with a significant reduction in events in subjects with already diagnosed cardiovascular disease or at high risk. Furthermore, this drug has also proved effective in slowing the progression of nephropathy in diabetic patients and patients with chronic renal failure. These effects are probably due to multiple mechanisms related to weight loss and glycaemic control, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic properties, and a direct mechanism of vascular and renal protection. More recently, a formulation that requires the oral intake of the drug once a day has been introduced on the market, which maintains the efficacy results of the subcutaneous formulation unchanged.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular preventionDiabetes mellitusObesitySemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID40248301
PMCPMC12001787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.