ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025
From the SELECT study to SOUL: different administration methods of semaglutide but same efficacy?
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Semaglutide in the Real World: Attitudes of the Population.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is a well-established agent in managing patients with high cardiovascular risk. Initially, a formulation was introduced for weekly subcutaneous administration that demonstrated good tolerability and excellent efficacy in controlling glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in reducing body weight in obese and/or overweight subjects, even non-diabetics. Subsequent evidence has shown that the advantages of this drug go beyond simple glucose homoeostasis and weight reduction. Several randomized clinical trials have, in fact, highlighted the effect of semaglutide on improving cardiovascular outcomes with a significant reduction in events in subjects with already diagnosed cardiovascular disease or at high risk. Furthermore, this drug has also proved effective in slowing the progression of nephropathy in diabetic patients and patients with chronic renal failure. These effects are probably due to multiple mechanisms related to weight loss and glycaemic control, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic properties, and a direct mechanism of vascular and renal protection. More recently, a formulation that requires the oral intake of the drug once a day has been introduced on the market, which maintains the efficacy results of the subcutaneous formulation unchanged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.