Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248289›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

The advantages of physiological pacing.

Ilaria Finamora, Carlo Colaiaco, Karim Mahfouz, Francesco Adamo, Nicola Danisi, Carmine De Lucia, Alessio Nardini, Fabrizio Ammirati, Luca Santini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilaria FinamoraCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carlo ColaiacoCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Karim MahfouzCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Francesco AdamoCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Nicola DanisiCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carmine De LuciaCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alessio NardiniGeneral Direction of the Mission Unit for the Implementation of PNRR Interventions, Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio AmmiratiCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Luca SantiniCardiology Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence that conventional right ventricular pacing can result in the development of cardiomyopathy and heart failure over time has prompted the search for alternative pacing sites. Conduction system pacing (CSP) represents an attempt to overcome the limitations of conventional pacing and to provide an alternative for patients with reduced EF and various degrees of dyssynchrony for whom resynchronization therapy is not feasible for technical or anatomical reasons. In particular, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), with their advantages and disadvantages, have been shown to meet the criteria of physiological pacing. The former, although technically more challenging and less satisfactory in terms of electrical parameters, allows to obtain a QRS complex that is identical to the spontaneous one. The latter produces a wider paced QRS and although the technical complexity at the time of implantation is significantly reduced, is subject to a series of mechanical complications related to the trans-septal positioning of the lead. Careful patient selection along with an adequate learning curve for the operators make CSP a safe and effective procedure, although burdened by a higher complication rate compared with conventional pacing. Future studies will clarify its role, which is currently limited by current ESC guidelines to His Pacing only as an alternative procedure in case of failure of resynchronization therapy (class of recommendation IIa), after the 'ablate and pace' procedure or as an alternative to right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block, left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and an expected right ventricular pacing percentage >20% (class of recommendation IIb).

Indexed as

Conduction systemHis pacingLeft bundle branch pacingPace-induced cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID40248289
PMCPMC12001782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.