Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248287›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

The REVOLUTION project: planning and performing surgical revascularization based solely on coronary computed tomography angiography.

Leonardo Bolognese, Matteo Rocco Reccia, Marco Chioccioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonardo BologneseCardiovascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Toscana Sudest, San Donato Hospital, Via Pietro Nenni 22, Arezzo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-7870
Matteo Rocco RecciaCardiovascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Toscana Sudest, San Donato Hospital, Via Pietro Nenni 22, Arezzo, Italy.
Marco ChioccioliCardiovascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Toscana Sudest, San Donato Hospital, Via Pietro Nenni 22, Arezzo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive diagnostic tool that is increasingly being used as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), providing important information on the extent and severity of CAD. Furthermore, stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CT-FFR) have been recently introduced in clinical practice as new tools for evaluating the functional relevance of coronary stenoses. ICA has been the preferred diagnostic method to guide the decision-making process between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, two studies have investigated the feasibility of using CCTA rather than ICA to plan CABG. In patients with three-vessel disease and/or left main CAD, the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial concluded that clinical decision-making between CABG and PCI using CCTA had a high level of agreement with treatment decisions based on ICA. In the FASTTRACK study, CABG procedures were planned based on CCTA without knowledge of ICA. CABG guided by CCTA showed to be feasible with an acceptable safety profile in a selected population of complex CAD. These intriguing findings should be confirmed in a large randomized trial on the revascularization outcome by comparing patients who underwent a novel non-invasive vs. a traditional invasive roadmap.

Indexed as

Coronary artery bypass graftingCoronary computed tomographic angiographyInvasive coronary angiographyStable angina

Identifiers

PMID40248287
PMCPMC12001777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.