ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025
The REVOLUTION project: planning and performing surgical revascularization based solely on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive diagnostic tool that is increasingly being used as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), providing important information on the extent and severity of CAD. Furthermore, stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CT-FFR) have been recently introduced in clinical practice as new tools for evaluating the functional relevance of coronary stenoses. ICA has been the preferred diagnostic method to guide the decision-making process between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, two studies have investigated the feasibility of using CCTA rather than ICA to plan CABG. In patients with three-vessel disease and/or left main CAD, the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial concluded that clinical decision-making between CABG and PCI using CCTA had a high level of agreement with treatment decisions based on ICA. In the FASTTRACK study, CABG procedures were planned based on CCTA without knowledge of ICA. CABG guided by CCTA showed to be feasible with an acceptable safety profile in a selected population of complex CAD. These intriguing findings should be confirmed in a large randomized trial on the revascularization outcome by comparing patients who underwent a novel non-invasive vs. a traditional invasive roadmap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.