ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025
An evaluation of the adequacy of Indian national and state essential medicines lists (EMLs) for palliative care medical needs-a comparative analysis.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators to accessing and providing palliative care to people with cancer in the Bathinda district in Punjab: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic profile and vulnerabilities of people receiving home-based palliative care in Kerala, India.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Essential medicines lists (EMLs) guide the public sector procurement and supply of medications to impact access to adequate and appropriate palliative care drugs. This study evaluates the adequacy of India's national and sub-national EMLs that can directly impact palliative care for 5.4 million patients. Methods: In this qualitative document review, we compared Indian national, and state EMLs acquired from official government websites with the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) EML recommendations. We analysed data on the indication and formulation of drugs under the different categories of formulations present (all, some and no), and drugs absent. Literature review and inputs from palliative care experts provided alternatives of absent medications to assess the adequacy of lists in managing the symptoms listed by IAPHC. Results: We analysed 3 national and 27 state lists for 33 recommended drugs. The Central Government Health Services list had the maximum availability of all formulations of drugs (16 [48%]) nationally. Among states and union territories, the Delhi EML was the closest to IAHPC with 17 (52%) drugs with all formulations present. Karnataka had the most incomplete EML with only 3 (9%) drugs with all formulations present. No EML had all the recommended formulations of morphine. In one national and seventeen state EMLs, oral morphine was absent. Conclusion: While Indian EMLs lack drugs for palliative care when compared with the IAHPC EML, symptom management is adequate. There is a need for countries with limited resources to modify the IAPHC list for their settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.