ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Examined lymph node (ELN) count is a critical factor affecting the number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs). The impact of the ELN number on survival and staging remains unclear. Methods: This study included 4,291 stage N3 GC patients from the SEER database (training cohort) and 567 stage N3 GC patients from the FAHZZU database (validation cohort). The optimal ELN count and stage migration were investigated, and a modified TNM (mTNM) staging system including the ELN count was proposed. LASSO regression and random forest analyses were used to screen and evaluate the variables associated with survival, and an mTNM-based nomogram was constructed. The performance of the mTNM staging system and mTNM-based nomogram were compared with that of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system. Results: The optimal threshold of the ELN count was identified as 21. An insufficient number of ELNs (≤ 21) was associated with poorer survival outcomes and led to stage migration in all N3 patients. A new mTNM staging system was proposed, integrating the ELN count into the TNM staging system (8th edition). LASSO regression analysis revealed that age, tumor size, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the mTNM system were associated with overall survival (OS) outcomes, and random forest analysis revealed that the mTNM system was the most important variable for predicting survival. An mTNM-based nomogram was constructed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. Compared with the TNM staging system (8th edition), the mTNM staging system and mTNM-based nomogram showed superior prognosis discriminative ability, better predictive accuracy, and greater net improvement in survival outcomes. Conclusions: The optimal ELN count for N3 GC patients was 21. The mTNM staging system and mTNM-based nomogram showed superior discriminative ability, predictive accuracy, and greater net benefit for OS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.