ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Clinical-radiomics model for predicting internal mammary lymph node metastasis in operable breast cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Although preoperative prediction of axillary lymph nodes status has been achieved using radiomics and combined models, there is a dearth of research on internal mammary lymph node (IMN) metastasis status prediction. We developed a predictive model by combining clinicopathological factors with preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics to accurately predict IMN metastasis in breast cancer. Methods: Patients who had no evidence of IMN metastasis on preoperative images but underwent internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) were included in this study. Preoperative DCE-MRI and clinicopathological data of 124 patients with breast cancer were obtained, to developed Clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics models, separately. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to assess the models' clinical applicability. Results: The resulting area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.913, 0.831, 0.964 for the clinical model, the radiomics model, and the clinical-radiomics model, respectively. The Delong test revealed significant differences in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves only between the clinical and clinical-radiomics models (all P<0.05). DCA substantiated the clinical-radiomics model's optimal predictive efficiency, enhanced discriminatory ability, and maximum benefit. The AUC (95% confidence interval: 0.935-0.993) of the clinical-radiomics model is 0.964. Repeated k-fold cross validation showed that average accuracy and Standard deviation of clinical-radiomics model are 90.23% and 8.45%, respectively. And the calibration slope of clinical-radiomics model is 1.08(p=0.071). Conclusions: Although the clinical model was effective in predicting IMN status, the addition of DCE
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.