Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248206›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Clinical-radiomics model for predicting internal mammary lymph node metastasis in operable breast cancer patients.

Wei Wang, Wenyu Zhang, Ting Yu, QingWei Wu, ChengLin Yang, Jianbin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wenyu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Ting YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
QingWei WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
ChengLin YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jianbin LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although preoperative prediction of axillary lymph nodes status has been achieved using radiomics and combined models, there is a dearth of research on internal mammary lymph node (IMN) metastasis status prediction. We developed a predictive model by combining clinicopathological factors with preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics to accurately predict IMN metastasis in breast cancer. Methods: Patients who had no evidence of IMN metastasis on preoperative images but underwent internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) were included in this study. Preoperative DCE-MRI and clinicopathological data of 124 patients with breast cancer were obtained, to developed Clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics models, separately. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to assess the models' clinical applicability. Results: The resulting area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.913, 0.831, 0.964 for the clinical model, the radiomics model, and the clinical-radiomics model, respectively. The Delong test revealed significant differences in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves only between the clinical and clinical-radiomics models (all P<0.05). DCA substantiated the clinical-radiomics model's optimal predictive efficiency, enhanced discriminatory ability, and maximum benefit. The AUC (95% confidence interval: 0.935-0.993) of the clinical-radiomics model is 0.964. Repeated k-fold cross validation showed that average accuracy and Standard deviation of clinical-radiomics model are 90.23% and 8.45%, respectively. And the calibration slope of clinical-radiomics model is 1.08(p=0.071). Conclusions: Although the clinical model was effective in predicting IMN status, the addition of DCE

Indexed as

breast cancerclinicopathological factorsDCE-MRI radiomicsinternal mammary node metastasispredictive model

Identifiers

PMID40248206
PMCPMC12003139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.