ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Preoperative MR - based model for predicting prognosis in patients with intracranial extraventricular ependymoma.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate a prediction model based on brain MRI features to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with intracranial extraventricular ependymoma (IEE). Methods: The study included 114 patients with pathology-proven IEE, of whom 80 were randomly assigned to a training group and 34 to a validation group. Preoperative brain MRI images were assessed with the Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images (VASARI) feature set. Clinical variables were assessed including age, gender, KPS, pathological grade of the tumor and blood test data such as eosinophil, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to select the independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS. Three prediction models were built with clinical variables, MRI-VASARI features, and combined clinical and MRI-VASARI data, respectively. The predictive power of survival models was assessed using c-index and calibration curve. Results: Clinical variables such as eosinophil, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, and MRI-VASARI feature for definition of the non-enhancing margin (F13) were significantly correlated with the prognosis of DFS. Blood urea nitrogen, D-dimer, tumor location (F1), eloquent brain (F3), and T1/FLAIR ratio (F10) were independent predictors of OS. Based on these factors, prediction models were constructed. The concordance indices of the three survival models for OS were 0.732, 0.729, and 0.768, respectively. For DFS, the concordance indices were respectively 0.694, 0.576, and 0.714. Conclusion: Predictive modelling combining both clinical and MRI-VASARI features is robust and may assist in the assessment of prognosis in patients with IEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.