Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248132›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025

Phenylketonuria as an Adherence Disease.

Gérard Reach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gérard ReachHealth Education and Promotion Laboratory, Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-2665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores a novel challenge to adherence in patients with phenylketonuria (PKU). Traditional barriers to maintaining the core of PKU therapy, which involves dietary restrictions, include limited palatability, high costs, difficult access to low-phenylalanine foods, time constraints, and social interference. We propose that adherence may also be hindered by elevated phenylalanine levels in nonadherent patients, leading to cognitive and executive function impairment that reduces their ability to adhere to the diet. Specifically, we hypothesize that the pathophysiological features of PKU create a vicious cycle that exacerbates adherence challenges to the phenylalanine-restricted diet. We therefore propose that PKU may be considered "an adherence disease". The implications of this hypothesis are threefold: 1. Long-term dietary nonadherence is probable among individuals with PKU; 2. the disease itself contributes to the difficulty in adhering to dietary restrictions, potentially alleviating patient guilt; 3. while treatment options depend on individual factors such as disease severity, the most effective approach to mitigating the neurocognitive and psychosocial impacts of PKU is to replace or restore phenylalanine hydroxylase activity.

Indexed as

executive functionsgene therapyimpulsivityprospective memory

Identifiers

PMID40248132
PMCPMC12005202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.