ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025
Phenylketonuria as an Adherence Disease.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a Prolonged-Release Protein Substitute on 24-h Phenylalanine and Tyrosine Profiles in Phenylketonuria: A Randomized Crossover Study.Nutrients · 2026Trial
- Article
- How Well Is Blood Phenylalanine Controlled in Maternal PKU in Europe? Results from 102 Pregnancies.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Article
- Global Use of Casein Glycomacropeptide Protein Substitutes for Phenylketonuria (PKU): Health Professional Perspectives.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Phenylalanine homeostasis in metabolic disorders: epidemiological trends, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical treatment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review explores a novel challenge to adherence in patients with phenylketonuria (PKU). Traditional barriers to maintaining the core of PKU therapy, which involves dietary restrictions, include limited palatability, high costs, difficult access to low-phenylalanine foods, time constraints, and social interference. We propose that adherence may also be hindered by elevated phenylalanine levels in nonadherent patients, leading to cognitive and executive function impairment that reduces their ability to adhere to the diet. Specifically, we hypothesize that the pathophysiological features of PKU create a vicious cycle that exacerbates adherence challenges to the phenylalanine-restricted diet. We therefore propose that PKU may be considered "an adherence disease". The implications of this hypothesis are threefold: 1. Long-term dietary nonadherence is probable among individuals with PKU; 2. the disease itself contributes to the difficulty in adhering to dietary restrictions, potentially alleviating patient guilt; 3. while treatment options depend on individual factors such as disease severity, the most effective approach to mitigating the neurocognitive and psychosocial impacts of PKU is to replace or restore phenylalanine hydroxylase activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.