ArticleiScience2025
The clinical safety landscape for ocular AAV gene therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient Endolymphatic Sac-Directed Gene Delivery Using AAV8BP2 and Posterior Semicircular Canal Injection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Seroprevalence of anti-AAV neutralizing antibodiesin healthy and retinitis pigmentosa cohorts: A multi-province study in China.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Microglia-independent rAAV-induced inflammation causes persistent ocular immune dysregulation rescued by S1P receptor modulation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Human FGF1Cells · 2026Article
- Streamlined rAAV HeLaS3 producer cell line generation via GS selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Nanotechnology-Driven Strategies for Diagnosis and Therapy of Ocular Diseases.Current drug delivery · 2026Review
- Preclinical evaluation of AL-001, a gene therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Preclinical Assessment of Mitochondrial-Targeted ND4 Gene Therapy for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Base and Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Delivery Platforms, Safety, Efficacy, and Translational Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy is a promising approach for treating ocular monogenic or acquired diseases, though immunogenicity and safety remain critical considerations. We conducted a systematic review of 120 trials and 32 publications to assess immune responses across different delivery routes. Intravitreal administration was associated with higher rates of anterior uveitis (43.06% vs. 10.22%) and intermediate/posterior uveitis (40.36% vs. 6.18%) compared to subretinal delivery. Engineered AAV capsids, used exclusively in intravitreal studies, showed no significant difference in either type of uveitis incidence compared to natural serotypes. Prophylactic immunosuppression (PI) did not affect ocular or systemic immune responses in subretinal delivery, but significantly reduced systemic immune responses in intravitreal administration. These findings underscore the potential of PI to mitigate systemic immune responses in intravitreal AAV therapy. This review should help guide the choice of routes of administration and immunosuppression strategies, and highlights current trends in ocular AAV gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.