Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248083›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Predicting the immune therapy response of advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on primary tumor and lymph node radiomics features.

Dong Xie, Jinna Yu, Cong He, Han Jiang, Yonggang Qiu, Linfeng Fu, Lingting Kong, Hongwei Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dong XieDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Jinna YuDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Cong HeDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Han JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Yonggang QiuDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Linfeng FuDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Lingting KongDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Hongwei XuDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Second Hospital Medical Community General Hospital, Shaoxing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify imaging biomarkers of primary tumors and lymph nodes in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assess their predictive ability for treatment response (response vs. non-response) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after 6 months. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 83 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Quantitative imaging features of the maximum primary lung tumors and lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced CT imaging were extracted at baseline (time point 0, TP0) and after 2-3 cycles of immunotherapy (time point 1, TP1). Delta-radiomics features (delta-RFs) were defined as the net changes in radiomics features (RFs) between TP0 and TP1. Interobserver interclass coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation analyses were applied for feature selection, and logistic regression (LR) was used to build a model for predicting treatment response. Results: Four and five important delta-RFs were selected to construct the nodal and tumor models, respectively. Δ Tumor diameter was used for constructing the clinical prediction model. The predictive efficacy of the nodal model for the treatment response status was higher than that of the tumor and clinical models. In the training set, the AUC values for the three models were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.90-1.00), 0.86 (95% CI = 0.76-0.95), and 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71-0.93), respectively. In the validation set, the AUC values were 0.94 (95% CI = 0.85-1.00), 0.77 (95% CI = 0.56-0.98), and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.48-1.00), respectively. Conclusion: The nodal model based on delta-RFs performed well in distinguishing responders from non-responders and could identify patients more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Finally, the nodal model exhibited a higher classification performance than the tumor model.

Indexed as

deltaimmunitylymph nodesnon-small cell lung cancerprediction modelradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40248083
PMCPMC12003267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.