ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Variability in the classification, management, and outcome reporting for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chinese clinical practice guidelines for minimally invasive hip preservation techniques for femoral head osteonecrosis (2025 edition).International orthopaedics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is no universally-utilized classification system for avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH), a debilitating condition that arises due to impaired blood supply resulting in cortical collapse. AVNFH may require early intervention to prevent irreversible damage leading to total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to assess the variability in classification, management, and outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to AVNFH. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Medline were queried for RCTs on the treatment of AVNFH (2010-2023). The number of patients, number of femoral heads, minimum follow-up, AVNFH classification system, treatment interventions, and outcome measures were extracted. Variability in classification, management approach, and reporting of outcomes was evaluated. Results: A total of 30 RCTs met inclusion criteria, encompassing 1891 total patients. The mean number of patients in each study was 63 (SD = 41), with a mean minimum follow-up of 30 months (SD = 17). The Association Research Circulation Osseous classification system was utilized in 63 % (n = 19) of studies, Ficat and Arlet in 20 % (n = 6) of studies, Steinberg in 10 % (n = 3), Mitchell in 3 % (n = 1), and the China-Japan Friendship Hospital classifications in 3 % (n = 1). There were 61 treatment interventions, stratified into nine categories. Radiographic imaging was most commonly used to evaluate patients at follow-up. Conclusion: There are a variety of classification systems, treatments, and outcome measures utilized in the literature to categorize and quantify AVNFH. The utilization of a universally-accepted classification system and standardized outcome reporting may help to ensure reproducibility and accuracy given a continued lack of consensus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.