Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248039›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Recovery in personality disorders: the development and preliminary testing of a novel natural language processing model to identify recovery in mental health electronic records.

Giouliana Kadra-Scalzo, Jaya Chaturvedi, Oliver Dale, Richard D Hayes, Lifang Li, Shaza Mahmood, Jonathan Monk-Cunliffe, Angus Roberts, Paul Moran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giouliana Kadra-ScalzoInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jaya ChaturvediInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver DaleSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, United Kingdom.
Richard D HayesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lifang LiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shaza MahmoodInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan Monk-CunliffeCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Angus RobertsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul MoranCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The concept of recovery is of great importance in mental health as it emphasizes improvements in quality of life and functioning alongside the traditional focus on symptomatic remission. Yet, investigating non-symptomatic recovery in the field of personality disorders has been particularly challenging due to complexities in capturing the occurrence of recovery. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide a robust platform from which episodes of recovery can be detected. However, much of the relevant information may be embedded in free-text clinical notes, requiring the development of appropriate tools to extract these data. Methods: Using data from one of Europe's largest electronic health records databases [the Clinical Records Interactive Search (CRIS)], we developed and evaluated natural language processing (NLP) models for the identification of occupational and activities of daily living (ADL) recovery among individuals diagnosed with personality disorder. Results: The models on ADL performed better (precision: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.84) than those on occupational recovery (precision: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.52-0.72). However, the models performed less acceptably in correctly identifying all those who recovered, generally missing at least 50% of the population of those who had recovered. Conclusion: It is feasible to develop NLP models for the identification of recovery domains for individuals with a diagnosis of personality disorder. Future research needs to improve the efficiency of pre-processing strategies to handle long clinical documents.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsmental healthnatural language processingpersonality disorderrecoverywork

Identifiers

PMID40248039
PMCPMC12003297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.