Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40248009›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2025

Impact of normal, obstructive, and restrictive breathing patterns on aerosol drug delivery with jet and mesh nebulizers in simulated spontaneously breathing adults.

Arzu Ari, Jordan A Hoops, Zari Williams, James B Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arzu AriRespiratory Care Texas State University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-8144
Jordan A HoopsRespiratory Care Texas State University.
Zari WilliamsRespiratory Care Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas.
James B FinkAerogen Pharma.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aerosol drug delivery is widely used in treating respiratory conditions, but the patient's breathing pattern can significantly influence its effectiveness. This study investigates the impact of normal, obstructive, and restrictive breathing patterns on aerosol drug delivery with jet and mesh nebulizers in a simulated model of spontaneously breathing adults. Methods: A spontaneously breathing adult was simulated using a teaching manikin (Nasco Healthcare) connected to a breathing simulator (QuickLung Breather; IngMar Medical Inc). A collecting filter (CareFusion) was placed distal to the bifurcation of the mainstem bronchi and connected to the breathing simulator. Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg/3 mL) was delivered with jet (MistyMax 10) and mesh nebulizers (Aerogen Ultra). Each experiment was conducted in triplicate (n = 3), comparing drug delivery across six breathing patterns: (1) normal, (2) moderate obstruction, (3) severe obstruction, (4) moderate restriction, (5) severe restriction, and (6) combined obstruction and restriction. Data analysis included the Friedman ANOVA, uncorrected Dunn's test, and paired t-tests with Holm-Sidak's multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism 10.3), with statistical significance set at Results: Our findings indicate that obstructive, restrictive, and combined breathing patterns significantly reduce aerosol deposition with jet and mesh nebulizers compared to normal breathing ( Conclusions: This study highlights the necessity for tailored aerosol therapy strategies to optimize drug delivery in patients with different respiratory conditions..

Indexed as

AerosolsIn vitroNebulizersObstructive breathingRestrictive breathing

Identifiers

PMID40248009
PMCPMC12005052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.