ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Repeat sternotomy for congenital heart surgery-impact of inadvertent cardiac injury.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the impact of complications resulting from inadvertent cardiac injury occurring during repeat sternotomy (RS) for congenital heart surgery and identify possible predisposing risk factors for this eventuality. Methods: A retrospective observational study was initiated to investigate complications related to RS in congenital heart surgery. Hospital records of patients who underwent RS from January 2016 to December 2020 in the department of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery were reviewed. Preoperative, operative, and post-operative datasets were collected and analysed for incidence of inadvertent cardiac injury and its impact on subsequent clinical course. An attempt was made to identify possible predisposing factors that might contribute to this complication. Results: The study included a total of 261 patients. During RS cardiac injury occurred in 10 patients (3.83%). Postoperatively, organ dysfunction was observed in 49 patients (18.77%), sternal wound infection in 7 patients (2.68%), and pulmonary complications and arrhythmias were both observed in 12 patients each (4.60%). Thirty-day mortality was 1.53% (4/261). Patients who had cardiac injury during sternotomy had significantly higher mortality (20% vs 0.8%, Conclusion: Reoperations are a necessity in many forms of congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery. Inadvertent cardiac injury during RS adversely impacted survival in our study. On the other hand, the number of previous sternotomies, duration of surgery, interval from previous sternotomy, and CPB time had no impact on mortality as long as cardiac injury was avoided. Every possible measure must therefore be taken to avoid inadvertent cardiac injury during RS in children with CHD. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01865-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.